![]() ![]() (It is impossible for a charger to get 200/200 because of how power efficiency works, and you wouldn't necessarily want to buy one from a no-name versus Apple even if it did.) The other Apple charger on SD right now, the 96W, gets a 140/200, a very respectable efficiency level for a conservatively-designed, highly safe charger. In general, higher wattage chargers are more efficient nowadays. You might say, "there are lower ones than this from Apple!" and you'd be right, but notice how those are much lower wattages. ![]() I'd give it a pass.Įdit: to save people having to click through the comments, it was rated an "E" with a Power Quality Score of 80/200, which you can verify here: yId=1&vendorId= 1 FYI – while Apple chargers are generally high quality, this SPECIFIC one is known for having terrible power efficiency and temperature issues.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |